Secure Code & Dependency Review
Reduce security vulnerabilities and technical debt by analyzing your application’s source code, third-party dependencies, and libraries to identify weaknesses before they can be exploited.
What You Get
Clear findings. Prioritized risks. Actionable fixes.
What’s Included
Included
- Manual and automated source code review for security flaws
- Dependency and library vulnerability assessment
- Business logic and workflow analysis
- Authentication, authorization, and session management review
- Logging, error handling, and exception review
- Compliance mapping (PCI DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR)
Not Included
- Penetration testing of deployed applications (covered under Web App / API Penetration Testing)
- Social engineering or phishing attacks
- Performance or stress testing
- Zero-day vulnerability research beyond known CVEs
Assumptions & Dependencies
- Access to source code repository (Git, SVN, or equivalent)
- Build environment and instructions for running the application
- Documentation for workflows, APIs, and third-party libraries
- Collaboration with development teams for clarification
How It Works
Discovery & Access
- Define scope of application, modules, and libraries
- Identify critical workflows and sensitive functionality
- Access source code repository, build environments, and dependency manifests
Setup & Onboarding
- Configure automated static analysis tools
- Verify access and environment readiness
- Confirm testing boundaries and rules of engagement
Execution
- Automated code scanning for known patterns and vulnerabilities
- Manual code review for logic flaws, insecure patterns, and potential abuse scenarios
- Dependency scanning for outdated libraries, CVEs, and insecure packages
- Review authentication, authorization, and data handling mechanisms
Findings Review
- Validate vulnerabilities and remove false positives
- Risk scoring and prioritization
- Map technical findings to business and compliance impact
Remediation Support (Optional)
- Walkthrough sessions with development teams
- Recommendations for secure coding practices
- Prioritized remediation guidance
Retest / Cadence
- Re-validation of remediated vulnerabilities
- Scheduled follow-up reviews for new code releases
- Integration into CI/CD pipelines for ongoing security assurance
Why Choose Us
Why Trust Cyber Bark LLC
Methodology & Standards
Security & Confidentiality
We protect your environment and data through:
Least-privilege access for reviewers
Encrypted storage of source code and artifacts
Role-based access controls and secure disposal after engagement
Customer Testimonials
Frequently Asked Questions
What do you need from us to start?
Access to source code repositories, dependency manifests, build instructions, and documentation of critical workflows.
How long does a Secure Code Review take?
Typically 10–20 business days depending on application size and complexity.
What does the deliverable look like?
Executive summary, technical report, annotated code, dependency inventory, and remediation guidance.
Do you review third-party libraries and dependencies?
Yes. We identify vulnerabilities, outdated versions, and security risks in all included dependencies.
Do you provide remediation help?
Yes. Step-by-step guidance and developer walkthroughs are included.
Do you retest after fixes?
Yes. Retesting and validation ensure all vulnerabilities are addressed
How do you handle sensitive data?
Encrypted storage, restricted access, and least-privilege principles are applied.
Can you integrate with our ticketing tools?
Yes. Jira, ServiceNow, and CSV exports are supported.
Get in Touch with Cyber Bark LLC
Identify risks, validate security controls, and get clear remediation guidance, contact us to start your assessment.
"I purchased the WCAG Accessibility Report from Cyber Bark, and it helped us resolve several Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance issues on our website. What impressed me the most was that the report was priceless – it even identified typos and broken links we didn't even know we had. The Cyber Bark team did an excellent job of explaining everything clearly and telling us how to navigate the findings. She also worked directly with our web developers to ensure that the improvements were implemented correctly. Truly a great company to work with. highly recommended!"